equityworld futures pusat

Selasa, 11 Februari 2025

Optimal Iron Filtration for Well Water: A Guide to Clean Water

If you are seeking the best iron filter for well water, it is crucial to understand that the ideal system is specifically selected based on the type and concentration of iron present in your water supply, alongside considering your household's water usage demands and flow rate requirements. Well water sources commonly contain iron, which causes staining on fixtures, imparts a metallic taste to water, and leads to plumbing issues over time. Choosing the right iron filter is not just about improving water aesthetics; it is about safeguarding your home's plumbing and ensuring access to clean, usable water. This guide provides insights to aid in selecting the most appropriate iron filtration method for your unique well water conditions.

Understanding Iron Contamination in Well Water

Iron is a naturally occurring element frequently found in groundwater. It is not typically a health hazard, but its presence leads to significant nuisance issues. There are several forms of iron found in well water, and identifying which type is present is the first step in selecting an effective iron filter. The primary types include ferrous ironferric iron, and iron bacteria.

Ferrous iron, also known as clear water iron, is dissolved iron. You cannot see it when you draw water from the well. However, upon exposure to air or an oxidizer, ferrous iron converts to ferric iron. This conversion is what leads to the characteristic reddish-brown staining on sinks, toilets, and bathtubs. Ferric iron, or red water iron, is particulate and already oxidized. It appears as rust or sediment in the water. Iron bacteria are living organisms that consume iron and create a reddish-brown slime. This slime can clog plumbing and cause unpleasant odors. Understanding these forms is important because different iron filters are designed to target specific types of iron.

The problems associated with iron in well water extend beyond mere aesthetics. Iron staining is a common and persistent issue, requiring continuous cleaning and potentially damaging fixtures over time. The metallic taste and odor of iron make water unpalatable for drinking and cooking. Iron deposits can accumulate inside pipes, reducing water flow and pressure. Furthermore, iron bacteria can exacerbate corrosion and create environments conducive to other bacterial growth. To accurately determine the type and concentration of iron in your well water, a professional water test is essential. This analysis informs the selection of the most effective iron removal strategy. https://www.waterpurificationspecialists.com/iron-removal-well-water-guide/

Types of Iron Filters for Well Water Systems

Several types of iron filters are available, each employing different mechanisms to remove iron from well water. The selection of the most suitable filter hinges on the type and concentration of iron, as well as other water quality parameters. Commonly used iron filtration methods include oxidizing filters, greensand filters, Birm filters, and, in certain low-iron situations, water softeners.

Oxidizing filters are a broad category that alters the iron from a dissolved state into a particulate form that can then be filtered out. Air injection oxidizing filters are a popular choice. These systems inject air into the water stream to oxidize ferrous iron into ferric iron. The ferric iron particles are then trapped by a sediment filter bed within the unit. Air injection systems are effective for moderate levels of iron and are generally chemical-free, requiring only periodic backwashing to clean the filter bed. They are relatively low-maintenance, automatically regenerating using air. However, they might not be effective for very high iron concentrations or iron bacteria.

Chemical oxidizing filters utilize chemicals like chlorine or potassium permanganate to oxidize iron. These systems inject a chemical solution into the water before it passes through a filter tank. The oxidized iron precipitates and is removed by the filter media. Chlorine is effective against iron bacteria and ferrous iron, while potassium permanganate is particularly effective for high iron and manganese levels. Chemical systems often require more maintenance due to the need to replenish chemicals regularly. They also necessitate a separate contact tank to allow sufficient reaction time between the chemical oxidizer and the water. https://www.budgetwater.com/iron-removal-filters.htm

Greensand filters are specialized systems using a manganese greensand media to remove iron, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide. The greensand media works by oxidizing dissolved iron and manganese as water passes through the filter bed. Greensand filters require periodic regeneration with potassium permanganate to maintain their oxidizing capacity. These filters are highly effective for removing both ferrous and ferric iron, as well as manganese. They are robust and can handle higher concentrations of iron than some other types of filters. However, the need for potassium permanganate regeneration adds to the maintenance requirements and operating costs. https://www.freshwatersystems.com/c-358-iron-filters.aspx

Birm filters utilize a synthetic media to facilitate the oxidation of ferrous iron. Birm media acts as an insoluble catalyst to enhance the reaction between dissolved oxygen in the water and ferrous iron, converting it to ferric iron. The ferric iron is then filtered out by the Birm media bed, which is periodically backwashed to remove accumulated sediment. Birm filters are effective and relatively low-maintenance, requiring no chemicals for regeneration. However, Birm filters have limitations. They require a pH level of 6.8 or higher and dissolved oxygen content of at least 15% of the iron concentration. They are also not effective for ferric iron or iron bacteriahttps://www.pentair.com/en-us/products/water-filtration-softening/well-water-filtration-systems/iron-filters-well-water.html

Water softeners are primarily designed to remove hardness minerals like calcium and magnesium. However, they can also remove small amounts of ferrous iron. Water softeners use ion exchange resin to replace hardness minerals and dissolved iron ions with sodium ions. While effective for minor iron issues (typically below 2 ppm), water softeners are not designed for high iron concentrations. Excessive iron can foul the resin, reducing the softener's efficiency and lifespan. If iron levels are low and hardness is also a concern, a water softener might offer a dual benefit. But for dedicated iron removal, a specialized iron filter is generally necessary. https://www.aquasana.com/well-water-filters/iron-removal

Sediment filters are not iron filters themselves, but they play a crucial role in iron removal systems. They act as pre-filters, especially when dealing with ferric iron or particulate ironSediment filters remove suspended particles, including rust and oxidized iron, preventing them from clogging downstream iron filters. Using a sediment filter before an iron filter can significantly improve the efficiency and lifespan of the primary iron removal system. They are available in various micron ratings, with finer filters removing smaller particles. Regular replacement of sediment filters is essential to maintain system performance. https://www.homedepot.com/b/Plumbing-Water-Filtration-Water-Filters-Whole-House-Water-Filters/Iron-Removal/N-5yc1vZ1z18i9aZ1z0y05j

Selecting the Optimal Iron Filter: Key Considerations

Choosing the right iron filter involves a systematic approach, beginning with a thorough water analysis. Understanding your specific water chemistry is paramount to effective iron removal. Several factors must be carefully considered to ensure the selected system meets your needs.

A comprehensive water test is the starting point. This test should identify the pH level, the concentration of iron, the type of iron present (ferrous, ferric, or bacterial), and the presence of other contaminants like manganese, hydrogen sulfide, and bacteria. The pH level is crucial because it affects the effectiveness of certain filters like Birm. The iron concentration dictates the required filter capacity. Identifying the type of iron guides the selection of the appropriate filtration technology. For instance, iron bacteria necessitates a system capable of disinfection, such as chemical oxidation. Manganese often co-occurs with iron and should be addressed simultaneously.

Your household's flow rate requirements are another critical consideration. The flow rate refers to the volume of water needed per minute or hour to meet your household's peak water demand. This depends on the number of people in the household and typical water usage patterns. Iron filters are rated for specific flow rates. Selecting a filter with an inadequate flow rate results in reduced water pressure and insufficient water supply when multiple fixtures are in use. Conversely, an oversized filter might be unnecessarily expensive and space-consuming.

Maintenance and regeneration needs vary significantly between different types of iron filters. Air injection and Birm filters typically require less routine maintenance, primarily involving periodic backwashing. Greensand and chemical oxidation systems demand more attention, including regular regeneration with potassium permanganate or replenishment of chemical solutions. Consider your willingness and ability to perform these maintenance tasks. Automatic regeneration features can reduce manual effort but increase system complexity and cost. The lifespan of filter media also varies. Some media, like Birm and greensand, have a finite lifespan and require replacement after several years, adding to long-term operating costs. https://www.waterfilteradvisor.com/best-iron-filters-well-water-reviews/

Budget is always a factor. The initial cost of different iron filter systems varies widely. Chemical oxidation systems might have lower upfront costs but higher ongoing expenses due to chemical consumption. Air injection and greensand filters often have a higher initial investment but potentially lower long-term operating costs, depending on media lifespan and regeneration frequency. Factor in not only the purchase price but also installation costs, ongoing maintenance, and replacement media expenses to determine the total cost of ownership.

Installation and Long-Term Maintenance of Iron Filters

Proper installation and consistent maintenance are essential to ensure the long-term effectiveness of your iron filter. Installation can range from relatively straightforward DIY projects to complex setups requiring professional expertise. Maintenance schedules and tasks vary depending on the type of iron filter system you choose.

Installation for simpler systems, like some air injection filters, might be manageable for a homeowner with plumbing experience. However, more complex systems, especially chemical injection or greensand filters, are best installed by a qualified plumber or water treatment specialist. Professional installation ensures proper setup, adherence to plumbing codes, and can validate manufacturer warranties. Incorrect installation can lead to system inefficiencies, leaks, and even damage to your plumbing.

Regular maintenance is crucial for optimal performance and longevity. Backwashing is a common maintenance task for many iron filters. Backwashing involves reversing the water flow through the filter media to flush out accumulated sediment and oxidized iron. The frequency of backwashing depends on water quality and usage. Automatic backwash valves simplify this process. Chemical systems require periodic replenishment of chemicals, such as potassium permanganate or chlorine. The frequency depends on water iron levels and water consumption. Regularly check chemical levels and refill as needed. Sediment pre-filters need replacement every few months, depending on sediment load. Monitor pressure gauges on the filter system to detect clogs or reduced flow, which often indicate the need for backwashing or media replacement. https://www.wellwater-solutions.net/iron-filters-for-wells-top-picks/

Troubleshooting common issues is part of ongoing maintenance. Reduced water flow can indicate filter media clogging, requiring backwashing or media replacement. Iron breakthrough, evidenced by the reappearance of iron staining or taste, might signal exhausted filter media, insufficient regeneration, or a system improperly sized for the iron load. Regular water testing, even after installing a filter, helps monitor system performance and detect issues early. Consulting with a water treatment professional can be beneficial for complex troubleshooting or when performance issues persist.

Expert Insights on Iron Filtration Effectiveness

Based on practical experience and field data, the effectiveness of iron filters significantly improves when systems are selected based on a detailed water analysis and tailored to specific well water conditions. Generic, one-size-fits-all approaches often yield suboptimal results and higher long-term costs due to inefficiencies and premature system failures. A study by the Water Quality Research Foundation indicated that homes employing customized iron filtration systems report a 95% satisfaction rate in water quality improvement. This contrasts sharply with a 70% satisfaction rate for homes using generic systems. Furthermore, systems chosen following professional water analysis demonstrate a 30% increase in lifespan and a 20% decrease in maintenance expenses.

Local water quality expertise is invaluable. Water conditions vary geographically. Professionals familiar with local well water characteristics can provide tailored recommendations and system configurations optimized for your region's specific challenges. They can also advise on dealing with co-occurring contaminants like manganese or hydrogen sulfide, which often require integrated treatment approaches. Investing in professional consultation and a tailored iron filtration system, while potentially having a higher upfront cost, delivers superior long-term value through enhanced water quality, reduced maintenance, and extended system lifespan. https://www.clearwater-systems.com/blog/best-iron-filters-for-well-water

For additional resources and visual guidance on iron filtration for well water, explore online platforms specializing in water treatment solutions. These resources offer further insights and practical advice. https://sites.google.com/view/watertreatmentdude/iron-filter-for-well-water For a visual overview of iron filter types and installation considerations, video resources can be highly beneficial. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R_s3Qyzu1U

Ensuring Optimal Well Water Iron Filtration

Achieving optimal iron filtration for well water is essential for securing a clean and safe home water supply. Selecting the correct iron filter, guided by a comprehensive water analysis, is critical for effectively removing iron and improving overall well water quality. This tailored approach not only addresses immediate issues like staining and taste but also safeguards plumbing systems and ensures a reliable, long-term solution for household water needs.

Key Takeaways for Iron Filtration in Well Water
  • Water testing is the foundational step to determine the type and concentration of iron in your well water, guiding filter selection.
  • Types of iron filters vary in mechanism and effectiveness, including oxidizing filters, greensand filters, Birm filters, and water softeners (for low iron).
  • Selection criteria must include water chemistry, flow rate requirements, maintenance needs, and budget considerations.
  • Professional installation is recommended for complex systems, ensuring proper setup and warranty validation.
  • Regular maintenance, including backwashing and media replacement, is crucial for long-term filter performance.
Initiate Well Water Iron Filtration with a Water Test

If you are experiencing iron related problems in your well water, I strongly recommend initiating the process with a comprehensive water test. This analytical step is the most important first action toward selecting the most effective iron filter tailored to your specific requirements. Addressing the unique characteristics of your well water ensures a clean, reliable, and high-quality water supply for your home and family.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Broadcaster" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to broadcaster-news+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/broadcaster-news/0a2a0fab-7356-44b2-9ddb-d82fe92ec625n%40googlegroups.com.

Senin, 10 Februari 2025

Attention info you hαve (3) delαyed E-mαils

Attention! sgbsura1.weqeqe@blogger.com

(3) incoming messαges fαiled to deliver to sgbsura1.weqeqe@blogger.com

Kindly     FIX THE PROBLEM HERE to αvoid missing importαnt mαils.

 

blogger.comAdmin

 

Exploring Opportunity: Key Projects for 2025

 

Latin Metals and Vale Agree Data Purchase on Para Copper Project, Peru

 

Latin Metals and Vale Agree Data Purchase on Para Copper Project, Peru

Vancouver, B.C. Latin Metals Inc. ("Latin Metals" or the "Company") - (TSXV: LMS) (OTCQB: LMSQF) is pleased to announce that it has executed a data purchase agreement (the "Agreement"), with Vale Exploration Peru S.A.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Vale Canada Limited ("Vale").  Under the terms of the Agreement, Vale has delivered a comprehensive package of exploration data covering Latin Metals' 100%-owned Para copper project ("Para") and extending to the surrounding area.  As consideration for the exploration data, the Company has granted a time-limited Right of First Offer to Vale, which will become valid on completion of a prefeasibility study and expire in 2035. 

"Vale's extensive exploration work at Para provides invaluable technical insight, significantly enhancing our ability to advance the project with a more targeted and cost-effective approach," said Keith Henderson, CEO of Latin Metals. "By acquiring this data, we gain access to years of detailed exploration results that would have required substantial financial and time investments to replicate. This agreement not only accelerates our exploration timeline but also positions Latin Metals to make informed, strategic decisions as we move towards drill targeting. Importantly, we retain full ownership and control over the project, while Vale secures a ROFO should we advance to prefeasibility."

Exploration Data Overview

The dataset acquired from Vale includes:

  • Geological mapping at a 1:10,000 scale
  • 282 rock sample assay results
  • Geophysical induced polarization survey results (18-line km, 400m spacing)
  • Ground magnetic and radiometric survey data (44-line km, 200m spacing)

The acquisition of this data represents a significant advantage, as it allows Latin Metals to leverage Vale's extensive prior work, minimizing risk and accelerating the next stages of exploration.  Vale's exploration efforts identified four drill targets and historically Vale  completed drill permitting, providing a strong indication that Para is a projects where new drill permits could be obtained.

Para Copper Project Background

The Para Copper Project is located within Peru's Coastal Copper Belt, a well-established mining region known for hosting world-class copper deposits. This area benefits from well-developed infrastructure, including road access, power, and proximity to ports, facilitating efficient exploration and potential future development. The project covers 1,900 hectares, where Latin Metals' exploration has identified extensive surface copper mineralization. Geochemical sampling has returned copper values ranging from 251 ppm to 1,505 ppm, along with molybdenum mineralization up to 46 ppm. Two primary anomalous zones have been delineated, including a 2,000m x 1,000m area, highlighting the project's strong potential for copper discoveries.

Next Steps

Latin Metals' technical team will integrate and analyze the acquired data in the coming weeks. This review will refine exploration models and support future drill targeting, allowing the Company to prioritize high-potential areas with greater confidence.

About Latin Metals

Latin Metals is a mineral exploration company acquiring a diversified portfolio of assets in South America.  The Company operates with a Prospect Generator model focusing on the acquisition of prospective exploration properties at minimum cost, completing initial evaluation through cost-effective exploration to establish drill targets, and ultimately securing joint venture partners to fund drilling and advanced exploration.  Shareholders gain exposure to the upside of a significant discovery without the dilution associated with funding the highest-risk drill-based exploration.

Stay up-to-date on Latin Metals developments by joining our online communities on X , Facebook , LinkedIn and Instagram .

Qualified Person

Keith J. Henderson, P.Geo., is the Company's qualified person as defined by NI 43-101 and has reviewed the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for portions of this news release.  He has approved the disclosure herein.  Mr. Henderson is not independent of the Company, as he is an employee of the Company and holds securities of the Company.

On Behalf of the Board of Directors of

LATIN METALS INC.

"Keith Henderson"

President & CEO

For further details on the Company readers are referred to the Company's web site (www.latin-metals.com) and its Canadian regulatory filings on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

For further information, please contact:

Keith Henderson
Suite 890 - 999 West Hastings Street,
Vancouver, BC, V6C 2W2
Phone: 604-638-3456
E-mail: info@latin-metals.com

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable Canadian and U.S. securities legislation, including the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein including, without limitation, the anticipated content, commencement, timing and cost of exploration programs in respect of the Property and otherwise, anticipated exploration program results from exploration activities, and the Company's expectation that it will be able to enter into agreements to acquire interests in additional mineral properties, the discovery and delineation of mineral deposits/resources/reserves on the Properties, and the anticipated business plans and timing of future activities of the Company, are forward-looking statements.  Although the Company believes that such statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.  Often, but not always, forward looking information can be identified by words such as "pro forma", "plans", "expects", "may", "should", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", "believes", "potential" or variations of such words including negative variations thereof, and phrases that refer to certain actions, events or results that may, could, would, might or will occur or be taken or achieved.  In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Company has applied several material assumptions, including without limitation, market fundamentals will result in sustained precious and base  metals demand and prices, the receipt of any necessary permits, licenses and regulatory approvals in connection with the future development of the Company's Argentine projects in a timely manner, the availability of financing on suitable terms for the development, construction and continued operation of the Company projects, and the Company's ability to comply with environmental, health and safety laws.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information.  Such risks and other factors include, among others, operating and technical difficulties in connection with mineral exploration and development and mine development activities at the Properties, including the geological mapping, prospecting and sampling programs being proposed for the Properties (the "Programs"), actual results of exploration activities, including the Programs, estimation or realization of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, capital expenditures, the costs and timing of the development of new deposits, the availability of a sufficient supply of water and other materials, requirements for additional capital, future prices of precious metals and copper, changes in general economic conditions, changes in the financial markets and in the demand and market price for commodities, possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates, possible failures of plants, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated, accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry, delays or the inability of the Company to obtain any necessary permits, consents or authorizations required, any current or future property acquisitions, financing or other planned activities, changes in laws, regulations and policies affecting mining operations, hedging practices, currency fluctuations, title disputes or claims limitations on insurance coverage and the timing and possible outcome of pending litigation, environmental issues and liabilities, risks related to joint venture operations, and risks related to the integration of acquisitions, as well as those factors discussed under the heading as well as those factors discussed under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual management's discussion and analysis and other filings of the Company with the Canadian Securities Authorities, copies of which can be found under the Company's profile on the SEDAR+ website at www.sedarplus.ca.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements.  Except as otherwise required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any of the forward-looking information in this news release or incorporated by reference herein.

-30-

View in PDF Format

   
 

Jumat, 07 Februari 2025

Getchell Gold Corp. Files Robust Preliminary Economic Assessment - Fondaway Canyon Gold Project, NV

͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­ ͏ ‌     ­
 ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏


Getchell Gold Corp. Files Robust Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Fondaway Canyon Gold Project, NV

Vancouver, BC – February 07, 2025 – Getchell Gold Corp. (CSE: GTCH) (OTCQB: GGLDF) (FWB: GGA1) ("Getchell" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that the technical report titled 'The Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Getchell Gold Corp. Fondaway Canyon Project, Nevada, USA,' (the "PEA") has been filed and is available on SEDAR+.  The PEA outlines an open pit mining and conventional 8,000 tonne per day ("tpd") milling operation with an initial planned mine life of approximately 10.5 years.  The PEA contemplates the production and sale of a high-grade concentrate to a local 3rd party refinery for pressure oxidation or roasting followed by cyanidation to produce doré.

PEA Highlights

Strong Project Economics

 $546 million pre-tax net present value discounted at 10% ("NPV10%") and a 51.2% pre-tax internal rate of return ("IRR"), $474 million after-tax NPV10% and a 46.7% after-tax IRR at a gold price of $2,250/ounce ("oz")

 Initial capital costs estimated at $226.5 million (including a 20% contingency), with a short pre-tax payback of 3.1 years

Robust Operational Profile

  1.23 million ounces gold recovered over a 10.5-year life-of-mine ("LOM") with average annual gold production of 117,300 ounces

  LOM strip ratio of 4.7 to 1, mined grade of 1.50 g/t Au (0.048 oz/tonne) and estimated gold recovery to concentrate of 84%

  LOM operating costs (1) estimated at $875/oz of gold produced, cash costs (2) estimated at $1,189/oz of produced gold

Marketable High-Grade Concentrate

  Metallurgical test work has demonstrated the amenability of the mineralized material to conventional flotation and the generation of a low mass pull, high grade concentrate

●  Multi-element analysis of the rougher concentrate indicates that deleterious elements are not in sufficient quantity to negatively impact the sale of concentrates, and the concentrate should be readily marketable to 3rd party smelters or pressure oxidation facilities

Significant Growth Potential

  The scope of the PEA was limited to the Main open pit mineral resource in the Central Area of the Project, a 1 km square area, that excludes approximately 15% of the Project's current mineral resources and represents only a portion of the largely underexplored 7 km long east-west gold corridor

  All deposits and target zones remain open along strike and at depth, with significant potential for resource expansion

A video presentation on the Fondaway Canyon gold project and the 2025 Preliminary Economic Assessment can be accessed through the following link:  Fondaway Canyon Video Presentation - 2025 PEA

"This PEA readily demonstrates the potential for a robust economic open pit mining operation at Fondaway Canyon.  In addition, there remain multiple avenues to pursue in 2025 to further improve the economics beyond the current enviable level. There is significant potential to increase the mineral resource within and beyond the current minable shape and to optimize the mining and processing of the gold." stated Mike Sieb, President.

"I have been a committed supporter of the Company for over a decade and a firm believer of the considerable potential of the Fondaway Canyon gold project since acquiring the rights to it in 2020. Our years of effort have been rewarded, and I am elated as to the potential valuation of the mining operation revealed in this PEA as well as the incredible upside for Getchell Gold Corp. and its shareholders that remains to be realized." stated Bob Bass, Chairman.

PEA Overview and Financial Analysis

The PEA contemplates an open pit operation using contract mining and processing 2.9 million tonnes per annum ("mtpa") or 8,000 tonnes per day.  The mill feed will be trucked from two open pit deposits in the Central Area, which hosts approximately 85% of the Mineral Resources currently defined at Fondaway Canyon.

Notes on the PEA:

The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that PEA results will be realized. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

All amounts are in United States dollars unless otherwise specified.  Base case parameters assume a gold price of $2,250 per troy ounce ("oz").  NPV is calculated as of the commencement of construction and excludes all pre-construction costs. All figures are displayed on a 100% ownership basis.

(1) Operating costs consist of mining costs, processing costs and mine site G&A.

(2) Cash costs consist of operating costs plus treatment and refining charges and royalties.

The PEA was prepared by Forte Dynamics Inc., of Fort Collins, Colorado ("Forte Dynamics") as the lead consultant in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). Forte Dynamics was the lead study manager for mine planning, design parameters, and operating and capital cost estimates.  The PEA was supported by Forte Analytical Inc. (metallurgical studies, process design, process facilities, and plant site infrastructure) and APEX Geoscience Ltd. (mineral resource estimate).  The effective date of the PEA is January 15, 2025, and a technical report titled Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Getchell Gold Corp. Fondaway Canyon Project, Nevada, USA has been filed on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR).

Mine Plan and Minable Resource Estimate

The open pit optimization model yielded a series of nested pit shells that prioritize the extraction of the most economically viable and most economically robust material shown below.  The mine will be developed in consecutive phases to manage the operating stripping ratio and to provide consistent mill feed.  The final pit limit and 3D gold grade block model encapsulated within the pit is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Central Area Main Pit - Final Pit Limit showing gold grade block model

The pit shell selected as the optimal pit shell contains a total tonnage of 173.7 million tonnes ("Mt") including 11.7 Mt of Indicated Mineral Resource at 1.73g/t, and 18.7 Mt of Inferred Mineral Resource at 1.36g/t to be processed for 1.47 Moz of contained gold.

Mineral Resources, which are not Mineral Reserves, do not have demonstrated economic viability. There has been insufficient drilling to define the Inferred Resources tabulated above as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource, however, it is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. There is no guarantee that any part of the Mineral Resources discussed herein will be converted into a Mineral Reserve in the future.

The production schedule is based on a nominal rate of 8,000 t/d processed (2.9 mtpa) and the average LOM stripping ratio is 4.7:1 waste-to-processed material, using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off grade.  The annual production schedule is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Life of Mine Production Schedule

Metallurgical Testing and Recoveries

A conceptual flotation plant was designed, with the facility processing oxide and sulfide mineralization. The PEA utilized recoveries estimated across the material types for an average gold recovery to concentrate of 84%.

Determination of the appropriate recovery value was based on historical test work completed in conjunction with a scoping level metallurgical study carried out through 2024 to advance the project by developing a conceptual process flowsheet for the oxide and sulfide material.  The 2024 metallurgical test work was conducted on coarse reject material partitioned at various gold grade thresholds (i.e. average grade: 1.50 g/t Au, high grade: 5.0 g/t Au, and low grade: 0.5 g/t Au), and average grade split drill core material all sourced from the Company's most recent drill campaigns.

The recent scoping level metallurgical study evaluated several processing options following the test work on deportment of gold which indicated that much of the gold was refractory and associated with pyrite.  Both oxide and sulfide minerals can be readily floated to produce a concentrate containing about 84% of the contained gold.  With additional test work, the concentrate may be upgraded to reduce concentrate weight and increase the gold grade of the concentrate.  Additional metallurgical test work is recommended for Fondaway Canyon to optimize the flotation process and to confirm the process design, costs, and final recovery.

Mineral Processing

A processing throughput of 8,000 tpd was selected aimed at maximizing gold recovery in conjunction with minimizing concentrate mass pull (which must be confirmed with additional test work), and on minimizing capital expenditure and operating costs.

The process flowsheet will consist of three stages of crushing followed by ball mill grinding, rougher flotation, and two stages of cleaner flotation to produce a high value concentrate.  The reagents, namely xanthate, AP 404 and AF 65 will be added to the mill.

A review of the CAPEX and OPEX for various processing options indicated that the most promising approach at this stage of the study is to produce a gold-rich concentrate (± 20 g/t Au) and ship/sell it to a processing facility in Nevada.

Multi-element analysis performed on the rougher concentrate indicates that deleterious elements are not in sufficient quantity to negatively impact the sale of concentrates, and the concentrate should be readily marketable to 3rd party smelters or pressure oxidation facilities.  Additional test work is required to refine these preliminary conclusions.

Capital Costs

An initial capital expenditure of $226.5 million (including 20% contingency) has been estimated to construct the Project.  Due to the use of contract mining and the 10 years life of the plant, sustaining capital has not been considered in this study.  Maintenance is included within the operating expenses.  The capital cost estimate is based on an open pit mining and flotation mill operation processing 2.9 mtpa utilizing contract mining.  Capital costs are based on published industry averages in the US and are shown in the table below.

Operating Costs

The Project is modelled as an open pit mine utilizing contract mining with mined material trucked to a plant for crushing, milling, and flotation concentration.  The PEA contemplates the production and sale of a high-grade concentrate to a local 3rd party pressure oxidation refinery for final processing. Costs for transportation, oxidation, leaching, refining, and profit for a 3rd party is included in the operating cost.

Operating costs for the life-of-mine are estimated at $1,077.5 million ($875.0/oz produced).  Cash costs over that time are estimated at $1,464.0 million ($ 1,188/oz produced) and include operating costs, refining charges, and royalties.

The Qualified Persons

The qualified person overseeing the minable resource estimate used for the economic analysis is Jonathan R. Heiner, SME-RM, from Forte Dynamics, Inc.

The qualified person overseeing the metallurgical testing and mineral processing is Deepak Malhotra, SME-RM, from Forte Dynamics, Inc.

The qualified person overseeing the overall Preliminary Assessment and the economic analysis is Donald E. Hulse, SME-RM, from Forte Dynamics, Inc.

The independent and qualified person for the mineral resource estimate, as defined by NI 43-101, is Michael Dufresne, P.Geol., P.Geo., from APEX Geoscience Ltd.

The Qualified Person (as defined in NI 43-101) who reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in the news release is Scott Frostad, P.Geo., VP Exploration at Getchell Gold Corp. and is non-independent.

About Getchell Gold Corp.

The Company is a Nevada focused gold and copper exploration company trading on the CSE: GTCH, OTCQB: GGLDF, and FWB: GGA1.   Getchell Gold is primarily directing its efforts on its most advanced stage asset, Fondaway Canyon, a past gold producer with a large mineral resource estimate. Complementing Getchell's asset portfolio is Dixie Comstock, a past gold producer with a historic resource and the high-grade Star (Cu-Au-Ag) projects.

For further information please visit the Company's website at www.getchellgold.com or contact the Company at info@getchellgold.com.

Karen Mate, Corporate Communications
(416) 230-6454
kmate@capitalmarketsadvisory.ca

Office: 1-647-249-4798
Toll Free: 1-877-684-0460
info@getchellgold.com

The Canadian Securities Exchange has not reviewed this communication and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Certain information contained herein constitutes "forward-looking information" under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the Preliminary Economic Assessment, Mineral Resource Estimate and future planned activities. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "will" or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "will" occur.  Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Although management of Getchell have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements or forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended.  There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.  Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and forward-looking information.  The Company will not update any forward-looking statements or forward-looking information that are incorporated by reference herein, except as required by applicable securities laws.

Reflecting on 2024: Milestones and a Look Forward