equityworld futures pusat

Minggu, 02 Agustus 2026

6 Best Iron Filters for Well Water in 2026

Iron in well water can leave orange stains on toilets, discolor laundry, create a metallic taste, and gradually build up inside plumbing fixtures and appliances. A properly selected iron filter treats the water before it reaches the rest of the house.

The best iron filter for well water depends on more than the brand name. You need to consider the amount and type of iron in the water, the presence of manganese or hydrogen sulfide, household water demand, pH, hardness, maintenance requirements, and available installation space.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency lists 0.3 milligrams per liter, or parts per million, as the secondary standard for iron in drinking water. Iron above this level may cause rusty color, sediment, metallic taste, and reddish-orange staining. 

After comparing treatment method, flow rate, iron-removal capability, maintenance, installation requirements, and suitability for different well-water conditions, these are the six best iron filters for well water.

Best Iron Filter for Well Water: Quick Comparison
Rank
Iron filter
Best for
Treatment type
Notable feature
1
SpringWell WS Series
Best overall
Air-injection oxidation and backwashing filtration
Treats iron, manganese, and sulfur
2
Culligan Smart High Efficiency Iron-Cleer
Best professionally installed system
Oxidation and automatic filtration
Smart monitoring and dealer support
3
Waterdrop WD-WHF3T-FG
Best cartridge-based value
Seven-stage cartridge filtration
15 GPM flow rate
4
SpringWell Filter and Salt-Based Softener
Best for iron and hard water
Oxidation filtration and ion-exchange softening
Treats multiple well-water problems
5
Fleck 2510-Based Iron Filter
Best customizable system
Configurable backwashing filtration
Flexible media and treatment setup
6
iSpring WHO32B-MKS
Best freestanding cartridge system
Three-stage cartridge filtration
Drain-assisted filter changes 1. SpringWell WS Series — Best Overall Iron Filter for Well Water

The SpringWell WS Series ranks first because it combines strong iron-removal capability with a chemical-free air-injection oxidation process.

The system creates an air pocket inside the treatment tank. As well water passes through this area, dissolved iron, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide are oxidized into particles that can be captured by the filter media. The system then backwashes automatically to flush accumulated contaminants into a drain.

SpringWell states that its air-injection system can treat up to 7 parts per million of iron, 1 part per million of manganese, and 8 parts per million of hydrogen sulfide. 

Two sizes are available:

  • The WS1 provides a service flow rate of 12 gallons per minute.
  • The WS4 provides a service flow rate of 18 gallons per minute.

The WS1 is generally suited to smaller and medium-sized households, while the WS4 provides additional capacity for larger homes with four or more bathrooms. Both systems require a drain connection and sufficient well-pump capacity for backwashing. 

Why it ranks first

The SpringWell WS Series is designed specifically for the most common aesthetic problems associated with well water: iron stains, black manganese deposits, and rotten-egg odor caused by hydrogen sulfide.

Unlike cartridge filters, the primary media does not require replacement every few months. Automatic backwashing reduces routine maintenance, although the control head, drain line, and media bed still need periodic inspection.

Advantages
  • Treats iron, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide
  • No routine chemical injection
  • Automatic backwashing
  • Available in 12 GPM and 18 GPM configurations
  • Suitable for whole-house treatment
  • Strong documented iron-treatment capacity
Limitations
  • Requires electricity and a drain
  • Needs adequate well-pump flow for backwashing
  • May require professional installation
  • Does not soften hard water
Best for

Homes with moderate to high iron levels, sulfur odor, manganese staining, or several related well-water problems.

2. Culligan Smart High Efficiency Iron-Cleer — Best Professionally Installed Iron Filter

The Culligan Smart High Efficiency Iron-Cleer is a strong option for homeowners who prefer professional water testing, system sizing, installation, and ongoing service.

The system uses an oxidation process to convert dissolved iron into filterable particles. It is intended to address metallic taste, rust-colored stains, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide odor. Its smart controls provide continuous system monitoring and allow users to review operating information remotely. 

Culligan also offers the Select Plus Series Iron-Cleer as a less technology-focused alternative. This system is designed for both well and municipal water and targets staining, unpleasant taste, appliance buildup, and hydrogen sulfide odor. 

Why it ranks second

Water chemistry can make iron treatment complicated. Factors such as pH, iron type, manganese, sulfur, tannins, and bacterial activity may affect performance. Culligan’s dealer-based model is useful when a homeowner does not want to size, install, program, and troubleshoot the equipment independently.

The main disadvantage is that product specifications and costs may depend on the system configuration recommended by the local dealer.

Advantages
  • Professional water testing and sizing
  • Automatic oxidation and filtration
  • Smart system monitoring
  • Treats iron-related staining and metallic taste
  • Can address manganese and hydrogen sulfide
  • Installation and service support are available
Limitations
  • Usually requires a dealer consultation
  • Pricing is not as transparent as direct-purchase systems
  • Features and capacity may vary by configuration
  • Homeowners have less control over installation
Best for

Homeowners who want a professionally configured iron filter with monitoring, installation, and local service.

3. Waterdrop WD-WHF3T-FG — Best Cartridge-Based Value

The Waterdrop WD-WHF3T-FG is a three-housing whole-house filter that uses seven stages of filtration to reduce iron, manganese, chlorine, rust, sediment, sand, and odor.

According to Waterdrop, third-party initial-performance testing showed reductions of 95.9% for iron, 99.7% for manganese, and 97.7% for chlorine. The system also carries NSF/ANSI 372 certification for lead-free materials. 

The WD-WHF3T-FG provides a rated flow of 15 gallons per minute and uses 5-micron filtration. Its iron-and-manganese cartridges are listed for approximately six to twelve months of service, although actual filter life depends heavily on contaminant levels and household water consumption. 

Why it ranks third

This Waterdrop system is easier to understand and maintain than a large backwashing tank. It does not require an electronic control valve or automatic regeneration cycle.

Its compact design and 15 GPM flow rate make it practical for homes with limited utility-room space. It also treats sediment and chlorine-related issues alongside iron and manganese.

However, percentage-reduction results should not be confused with a maximum supported iron concentration. Homeowners with severe iron contamination should confirm that a cartridge system can handle their laboratory results before purchasing.

Advantages
  • Seven-stage filtration
  • 15 GPM whole-house flow rate
  • Reduces iron, manganese, sediment, rust, chlorine, and odor
  • Compact compared with tank-based filters
  • No automatic backwashing cycle
  • Lead-free material certification
Limitations
  • Replacement cartridges create recurring expenses
  • Severe iron may clog cartridges quickly
  • No published maximum influent iron level on the product page
  • Does not remove hardness
  • Filter life varies substantially with water quality
Best for

Homes with mild to moderate iron, manganese, sediment, or chlorine concerns that need an accessible cartridge-based whole-house filter.

4. SpringWell Well Water Filter and Salt-Based Softener — Best for Iron and Hard Water

Iron and hardness are separate water-quality problems. An iron filter oxidizes and captures iron, while a water softener uses ion exchange to reduce calcium and magnesium.

The SpringWell Well Water Filter and Salt-Based Softener combines an air-injection iron filter with a conventional salt-based softener. This configuration treats iron, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide before reducing hardness minerals.

The iron-filter portion is rated for up to 7 parts per million of iron, 1 part per million of manganese, and 8 parts per million of hydrogen sulfide. The WS1 iron filter provides a 12 GPM service flow, while the WS4 provides an 18 GPM service flow. The corresponding softeners are available in different capacities for smaller and larger households. 

Why it ranks fourth

This combination is more appropriate than using a water softener alone when the well contains substantial iron. Heavy iron loading can foul a softener’s resin and reduce its efficiency. Placing a dedicated iron filter before the softener protects the softening stage and treats a broader range of water problems.

The tradeoff is increased equipment size, installation complexity, salt use, wastewater discharge, and maintenance.

Advantages
  • Treats iron and hard water in one coordinated setup
  • Reduces manganese and hydrogen sulfide
  • Helps protect the softener from heavy iron loading
  • Available for different household sizes
  • Automatic iron-filter backwashing
  • Provides softened water throughout the house
Limitations
  • Requires more installation space
  • Needs electricity, drainage, and a brine tank
  • Requires regular salt replenishment
  • Produces backwash and regeneration wastewater
  • More complex than a single iron filter
Best for

Well-water homes experiencing orange iron stains, scale buildup, soap scum, spotted dishes, and other signs of both iron and hardness.

5. Fleck 2510-Based Iron Filter — Best Customizable Iron-Removal System

A Fleck 2510-based iron filter is not always sold as one standardized package. Instead, the Fleck control valve may be paired with different tank sizes, oxidation methods, injectors, and filter media.

This flexibility allows a water-treatment professional to configure the system for the household’s iron level, pH, manganese concentration, sulfur odor, flow requirements, and available backwash rate.

The Fleck 2510 is used on automatic backwashing and regeneration systems. Its installation requirements include a drain, a bypass arrangement, appropriate water pressure, and sufficient backwash flow. Fleck documentation also warns that plumbing heavily clogged with iron should be cleaned or replaced and that a dedicated iron filter may be required ahead of a softener. 

Why it ranks fifth

A properly configured Fleck system can provide effective treatment and long-term serviceability. Replacement valves, seals, injectors, pistons, and control components are commonly serviceable rather than requiring replacement of the complete tank assembly.

Its main weakness is inconsistency between sellers. Two systems labeled as Fleck 2510 iron filters may use different media, tank sizes, oxidation methods, and programming. Buyers must examine the complete treatment package rather than evaluating the valve name alone.

Advantages
  • Highly configurable
  • Automatic backwashing
  • Serviceable control platform
  • Can be paired with different iron-filter media
  • Suitable for professionally designed systems
  • Available in different tank and flow configurations
Limitations
  • Performance depends on the complete system configuration
  • No single universal iron-removal rating
  • Requires correct programming and backwash flow
  • Usually needs professional sizing
  • Product quality may vary between assembled packages
Best for

Homeowners working with a knowledgeable installer who can build and program a system around detailed laboratory water-test results.

6. iSpring WHO32B-MKS — Best Freestanding Cartridge Iron Filter

The iSpring WHO32B-MKS is a three-stage whole-house cartridge system designed for iron, manganese, hydrogen sulfide, sediment, chlorine, and certain heavy metals.

The system is rated to treat dissolved iron concentrations of up to 3 parts per million and manganese concentrations of up to 1 part per million. It provides a flow rate of up to 15 gallons per minute. iSpring states that the cartridges may last for up to 150,000 gallons or 12 months, whichever occurs first. Actual service life will depend on the water’s contaminant concentration and household usage. 

The horizontal housings include drain valves that allow users to release pressure and drain water before removing the cartridges. The system also stands on its own steel frame, eliminating the need to mount heavy filter housings on a wall.

Why it ranks sixth

The WHO32B-MKS offers clearly stated iron and manganese limits, high whole-house flow, standard-sized cartridges, and a more convenient filter-change design.

It ranks below the backwashing systems because cartridge consumption can become expensive when well water contains heavy iron or sediment. The product page also indicated that the model was out of stock when reviewed, so availability should be verified before purchase. 

Advantages
  • Treats up to 3 PPM of dissolved iron
  • Treats up to 1 PPM of manganese
  • Up to 15 GPM flow rate
  • Targets hydrogen sulfide odor
  • Freestanding steel frame
  • Drain valves simplify cartridge replacement
  • Uses standard 20-by-4.5-inch cartridges
Limitations
  • Cartridge life decreases in heavily contaminated water
  • Replacement filters create recurring costs
  • Not intended for iron levels above its stated limit
  • Does not soften hard water
  • Availability may vary
Best for

Homes with low to moderate dissolved iron that need a freestanding cartridge system with easier filter changes.

How to Choose the Best Iron Filter for Well Water Test the well water first

Do not select an iron filter based only on orange stains or metallic taste. Obtain laboratory results for:

  • Total iron
  • Ferrous and ferric iron, when available
  • Manganese
  • pH
  • Hardness
  • Hydrogen sulfide
  • Turbidity and sediment
  • Tannins
  • Coliform bacteria
  • Nitrate and other locally relevant contaminants

The CDC recommends testing private well water at least once each year for total coliform bacteria, nitrates, total dissolved solids, and pH. Additional testing should be based on local conditions and observed water-quality problems. 

Identify the type of iron

Ferrous iron is dissolved and may initially appear clear. After exposure to air, the water can turn orange or brown. Ferric iron is already oxidized and may make the water appear discolored immediately. Organic or colloidal iron can be more difficult to remove because it may remain suspended or be associated with natural organic matter. 

A basic sediment cartridge may capture ferric particles but usually will not remove substantial dissolved ferrous iron without an oxidation stage.

Match the filter to the iron concentration

For lower iron levels, a specialized cartridge system may be sufficient. Higher concentrations generally favor an oxidation and backwashing system with a clearly documented iron limit.

Never assume that a filter reporting a high percentage reduction can treat water with any iron concentration. Reduction percentage, test conditions, filter capacity, and maximum influent concentration are different measurements.

Check pH requirements

Oxidation and filter-media performance can be affected by pH. Some iron filters work poorly in acidic water. Compare the laboratory pH result with the manufacturer’s operating range and determine whether a neutralizer is needed.

Confirm the required flow rate

The service flow rate must support simultaneous fixtures without causing a major pressure drop. Larger households, multiple bathrooms, high-flow showers, and large appliances may require a higher-capacity model.

Backwashing tank systems also need sufficient well-pump output. A filter that requires 5 or 7 GPM for backwashing may not clean itself properly if the well pump cannot maintain that rate.

Consider manganese and sulfur

Black staining may indicate manganese, while a rotten-egg smell often points to hydrogen sulfide. Choose a system specifically rated for these problems rather than assuming that every iron filter will remove them.

Decide between cartridge and backwashing filters

Cartridge iron filters generally have a lower initial complexity and require less floor space. They are often suitable for mild or moderate contamination.

Backwashing filters cost more to install but are generally better suited to higher contaminant loads. Instead of replacing cartridges frequently, they clean the media automatically by reversing water flow and sending accumulated material to a drain.

Frequently Asked Questions What is the best iron filter for well water?

The SpringWell WS Series is the best overall option in this ranking because it has a clearly stated iron-treatment limit, automatic backwashing, multiple flow-rate options, and the ability to treat manganese and hydrogen sulfide.

The most appropriate system still depends on laboratory water-test results.

How much iron can an iron filter remove?

Capacity varies by design. In this comparison, the SpringWell air-injection system is rated for up to 7 PPM of iron, while the iSpring WHO32B-MKS is rated for up to 3 PPM.

Other systems may report percentage reductions rather than a maximum incoming iron concentration. These figures should not be treated as interchangeable.

Will an iron filter remove the rotten-egg smell from well water?

Only filters designed to treat hydrogen sulfide should be expected to reduce rotten-egg odor. The SpringWell WS Series, Culligan Iron-Cleer systems, and iSpring WHO32B-MKS are designed to address hydrogen sulfide alongside iron.

Can a water softener remove iron?

A softener may reduce small amounts of dissolved iron, but it is not a substitute for a dedicated iron filter when iron concentrations are substantial. Excess iron can foul the resin, increase salt consumption, and shorten service life.

For water containing both high iron and hardness, an iron filter followed by a softener is generally the more appropriate configuration.

Do iron filters remove bacteria?

An iron filter should not be assumed to disinfect well water. Iron bacteria and disease-causing microorganisms require separate evaluation and may need well cleaning, disinfection, or an additional treatment stage.

Have the water tested by a qualified laboratory before relying on any filtration system for microbiological safety.

How often should an iron filter be replaced?

Replacement frequency depends on the type of filter.

Cartridge filters may require replacement every few months or approximately once per year. Backwashing media systems can operate for several years, but valves, injectors, drainage components, and media still require inspection and eventual servicing.

Does an iron filter reduce water pressure?

Any filter can reduce pressure if it is undersized, clogged, incorrectly installed, or operated beyond its rated flow. Select a system with sufficient service flow for the household and replace or backwash the filter as required.

Final Verdict

The SpringWell WS Series is the best iron filter for well water overall because of its air-injection oxidation process, automatic backwashing, strong documented iron capacity, and ability to treat manganese and hydrogen sulfide.

The Culligan Smart High Efficiency Iron-Cleer is the strongest choice for homeowners who prefer professional testing, installation, monitoring, and service.

The Waterdrop WD-WHF3T-FG provides a practical cartridge-based option for mild to moderate iron and sediment. The SpringWell filter-and-softener combination is more suitable when the home has both iron contamination and hard water.

A Fleck 2510-based system offers extensive customization when designed by a qualified installer. The iSpring WHO32B-MKS is a useful freestanding cartridge system for iron concentrations within its stated 3 PPM limit.

Before purchasing any iron filter for well water, test the water, confirm the type and concentration of iron, verify the household flow requirement, and check whether the well pump can support the system’s backwashing needs.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Broadcaster" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to broadcaster-news+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/broadcaster-news/948625b6-dd7e-4d95-a38d-d1d0986b289bn%40googlegroups.com.

Rabu, 29 Juli 2026

White Gold Provides Resource Growth and New Discovery Exploration Update on its White Gold and QV Properties, Yukon

White Gold Provides Resource Growth and New Discovery Exploration Update on its White Gold and QV Properties, Yukon

Email  Facebook  Instagram  LinkedIn  TikTok  Web  X  YouTube

TORONTO, July 29, 2026 – White Gold Corp. (TSX.V: WGO, OTCQX: WHGOF, FRA: 29W) (“White Gold” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide an update on its fully funded 2026 exploration program across its district-scale land package in the emerging White Gold District in Yukon, Canada. The primary objective of the 2026 program is to expand the Company’s known gold resources by targeting high probability near deposit mineralization on its Golden Saddle, Arc, Ryan’s Surprise, and VG deposits, and to make new discoveries in close proximity to these deposits.


With a significantly larger 2026 exploration program, resource-growth drilling will build on the success of the 2025 program, with highlight intervals including 56.10 m of 3.23 g/t Au (WHTGS25D0216) and 50.2m of 6.89 g/t Au (WHTGS25D0218A) at Golden Saddle, complemented by expansion drilling at Arc, Ryan’s Surprise and VG. In addition to resource-growth drilling, the Company has identified multiple new high priority, advanced discovery-stage targets, including Golden Saddle 2.0 and VG East, and is prospecting and mapping these targets in preparation for diamond drilling.

Key Highlights


  • A total of 18 diamond drill holes, totaling approximately 7,000 meters, have been completed to date in 2026. Three drill rigs are currently in operation, advancing the largest exploration drill program in the Company’s history on these deposits.
    
  • Golden Saddle – three holes have been completed, testing expansion of the high-grade core (1.1 million ounces Indicated (12.3 Mt @ 2.84 g/t Au)) and 93,000 ounces Inferred (1.4 Mt @ 2.03 g/t Au)), and parallel zones of mineralization in both the hanging wall and footwall (Figure 1).
    
  • VG – five holes have been completed to extend mineralization down plunge and along strike toward the east (Figure 2).
    
  • Ryan’s Surprise – seven step-out holes have been completed to expand mineralization along strike, both east and west away from currently defined mineralization (Figure 1).
    
  • Mapping and prospecting on multiple new early-stage targets across the White and QV properties has identified potential new high priority targets including the Golden Saddle 2.0 and the VG East targets.
    
  • Relogging and sampling has commenced on previously unassayed footwall and hanging-wall host rocks at Golden Saddle, which were not assayed in historical drilling but may host additional mineralization.
    
  • The Maiden Preliminary Economic Assessment on the White Gold Project is underway and expected to be delivered along with drill assays in the near term.

"With 18 holes and over 7,000 metres completed so far, this program is off to a strong start on our core objective: growing the resource base around our four known deposits. Golden Saddle, VG, Arc and Ryan's Surprise which all remain open, and we're excited about the early signals we're seeing at Golden Saddle 2.0 and VG East as well. Combined with the Preliminary Economic Assessment now in the final stages, 2026 is shaping up to be a pivotal year for the White Gold Project." said Dylan Langille, Vice President of Exploration for White Gold Corp.

“The White Gold project represents on of Canada’s highest grade open pittable deposits, which has been delineated with relatively much less drilling as compared to deposits of similar size. With the deposits being open for expansion and the additional targets in close proximity, we are quite optimistic for the continued growth potential. The value of our significant and growing resource base is now also complimented by the recent developments in the White Gold District and the additional attention to the Yukon as a whole, further validating the potential of White Gold’s truly district-scale opportunity.” stated David D’Onofrio, CEO.

2026 Drill Program - Resource Growth


The 2026 fully funded work program, supported by strategic partners including Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (TSX: AEM, NYSE: AEM), is targeting 15,000 to 20,000 meters of diamond drilling utilizing three drill rigs. The program started on May 28, 2026, with one diamond drill and ramped up to three diamond drills within a two-week period. Drilling has focused on our primary goal of adding ounces to our resource estimate through targeting high probability near deposit mineralization. A summary of progress is set out below.


Golden Saddle Deposit


The Golden Saddle contains an open-pit resource of 1.614 M oz Indicated (31.03 Mt @ 1.62 g/t Au)) and 268.7 k oz Inferred (7.84 Mt @ 1.07 g/t Au), defined by 210 drill holes for a total of approximately 61,000 meters (1)(2). Completed drilling to date has tested down plunge extension of the high-grade ore body (695,000 oz Indicated (4.4 Mt @ 4.88 g/t Au)), as well as parallel zones of mineralization in both the hanging wall and footwall zones Remaining drilling includes further extension and expansion of main zone and parallel zones but will also include growth along strike toward Golden Saddle West. In addition, a targeted program to relog and sample previously unsampled core from the footwall and hanging wall host rocks is underway, offering strong potential for additional resource growth.

VG Deposit


The VG deposit comprises 296,000 oz Inferred (6.285 Mt @ 1.46 g/t Au), defined by 65 drill holes for a total of approximately 7,600 meters (1)(2). Gold mineralization is modelled to a maximum vertical depth of 200 m, with the geometry of the modelled mineralization being cone shaped due to limited drilling across the deposit. Completed drilling to date has tested down-plunge growth of the current resource, with additional step-down and strike extension drilling remaining (Figure 2).

Ryan’s Surprise


The mineralization footprint at the Ryan’s Surprise deposit measures approximately 550 m north-south by 500 m east-west to a vertical depth of 650 m and remains open along strike and at depth. To date, the Ryan’s Surprise deposit contains 293,400 oz Inferred (5.820 Mt @ 1.57 g/t Au) defined by 35 drill holes for a total of approximately 8,370 meters (1)(2). Completed drilling has focused on roughly 75-meter step outs east and west to extend mineralization along strike, with additional extension drilling along strike and at depth still planned and remaining. Ryan’s Surprise is located 1.5 km west of the Golden Saddle deposit, along a 6.5 km long x 1 km wide north-northwest trend of anomalous gold and arsenic in soils (“Ryan’s Trend”), which also hosts several other prospective early-stage targets in close proximity with significant surface gold mineralization and represent further potential for expansion of the project.


Arc Deposit


The Arc deposit contains 115,800 oz Indicated (4.113 Mt @ 0.88 g/t Au) and 397,000 oz Inferred (12.25 Mt @ 1.01 g/t) across a 1.5 km strike length and down to an average vertical depth of approximately 100 m defined by 73 drill holes for a total of approximately 15,000 m(1)(2). Limited drilling on mineralization, particularly below 120 m vertical, presents a significant potential growth opportunity to add additional ounces to the mineral resource estimate in addition to expansion in other directions. Drilling on this target is planned for the second half of the exploration program.


2026 Drill Program – Near-Resource Discovery Opportunities


Multiple days of prospecting and mapping have been completed to further evaluate discovery stage targets across the White property identified with a combination of geophysics, elevated Au-in-soil anomalies, regional structural mapping, and surface geochemistry signatures. A large suite of hand specimens has been collected and submitted to the laboratory for analysis.


Golden Saddle 2.0


The Golden Saddle 2.0 target represents one of the highest-priority near-resource growth opportunities on the White Gold Project. Located approximately 2.5 km east-southeast of the Golden Saddle deposits, this target sits on the south side of the east-west strike-slip sinistral fault that acts as a primary structural control on the Golden Saddle and Arc deposits.


Extensive spatial and geophysical analysis indicates that Golden Saddle 2.0 exhibits a geological and geophysical signature remarkably similar to that of Golden Saddle. The target is defined by a distorted, high-gradient magnetic signature where north-south trending magnetic lineaments – interpreted as thrust faults – intersect the main east-west sinistral fault. This fault-intersection geometry creates a classic dilatational “sweet spot” for orogenic gold mineralization, characterized by near-fault brecciation and a low-pressure environment ideal for fluid flow and gold precipitation. The area is further supported by mapped ultramafic units and a robust gold-in-soil anomaly that trends east west, like Golden Saddle. Rock samples collected in 2026 demonstrate a suite of lithologies, alterations, structural fabrics, and mineralization comparable to those observed at the Golden Saddle deposit. Follow-up plans for this untested target are being evaluated.


VG East Target


Situated approximately 1.3 km ENE of the currently defined nearly 300,000-ounce Au VG Deposit, this target sits on the south side of the same structure interpreted to control mineralization seen at VG. It is defined by a 500-meter by 200-meter-high Au-in-soil anomaly that remains yet to be drilled. Current interpretation suggests faulting may have displaced a portion of the VG deposit to the east. Drilling is planned for this untested target.


Yukon-British Columbia Grid Connect


On June 26, 2026, the Honourable Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, announced that the federal government will prioritize financial and regulatory support for five priority transmission projects across Canada, including an approximately 800-km, +200-kV, high-voltage, direct-current transmission line connecting Yukon's grid to British Columbia. The announcement advances the federal government's National Electricity Strategy, launched by Prime Minister Mark Caney on May 14, 2026, which aims to double the capacity of Canada's grid by 2050. The Company welcomes the continued commitment of federal and territorial governments to advancing Canada's emerging mining districts, including the White Gold District in Yukon.

Assay Methodology & QA/QC


Diamond drilling on the White Gold Property will consist of NQ size drill core and will be cut in half on site using a diamond saw. Analytical work on the half core will be performed by Bureau Veritas, an internationally recognized analytical services provider, at its South Vancouver, British Columbia laboratory. Sample preparation will be carried out at its Whitehorse, Yukon prep facility and then shipped to BV’s Vancouver, BC facility for analysis. All diamond drill core samples will be prepared using the PRP70-250 package, where samples are weighed, dried, and crushed to greater than 70% passing a 2mm sieve, then pulverized to greater than 85% passing 75 microns. Samples will be analyzed by method FA430 (30g fire assay with AAS finish) for gold, and by package MA250 (0.25g, 4 acid digestion and ICP-MS analysis) for ultra-trace multi-element ICP.


The work will be completed using industry standard procedures, including a quality assurance/quality control (“QA/QC”) program consisting of insertion of standard, blank, and duplicate samples into the sample stream. BV also runs a comprehensive QA/QC program of standards, duplicates, and blanks within each sample stream.


Qualified Person


Dylan Langille, P.Geo. and Vice President of Exploration for the Company is a “qualified person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure of Mineral Projects and has reviewed and approved the content of this news release.


About White Gold Corp.


The Company owns a portfolio of 15,364 quartz claims across 21 properties covering 305,102 hectares (3,051 km2) representing approximately 40% of the Yukon's emerging White Gold District. The Company's flagship White Gold project hosts four near-surface gold deposits which collectively contain resource estimate of 1,732,300 ounces of gold in indicated resources (35.2 million tonnes grading 1.53 grams per tonne gold) and 1,265,900 ounces of gold in inferred resources (32.2 million tonnes grading 1.22 g/t Au) (see the Company's news release dated October 6, 2025)(1)(2). Regional exploration work has also produced several other new discoveries and prospective targets on the Company's claim packages which border sizable gold discoveries including the Coffee project owned by Talamore Mining (formerly Fuerte Metals) with Measured and Indicated Resources of 80.2 Mt grading 1.15 g/t Au for 2.96 million ounces of gold, and Inferred Resources of 21.2 Mt grading 1.17 g/t Au for 0.80 million ounces gold(3)(2), and Western Copper and Gold Corporation's Casino project which has Measured and Indicated Resources of 2,490.7 Mt grading 0.18 g/t Au, 0.14% Cu for 14.8 million ounces of gold and 7.6 billion pounds of copper, and Inferred Resources of 1,412.5 Mt grading 0.14 g/t Au, 0.10% Cu for 6.3 million ounces of gold and 3.1 billion pounds of copper(4)(2). For more information visit www.whitegoldcorp.ca.


(1) White Gold Corp. “White Gold Corp. Files Technical Report Demonstrating Significant 44% Increase in Indicated Resources to 1,732,300 oz Gold (35.2 million tonnes grading 1.53 g/t) and 13.4% Increase in Inferred Resources to 1,265,900 oz Gold (32.2 million tonnes grading 1.22 g/t) at its Flagship White Gold Project, Yukon, Canada” Press Release 6 Oct, 2025. https://www.whitegoldcorp.ca/news/white-gold-corp-files-technical-report-demonstrating-significant-44-increase-in-indicated-resources-to-1732300-oz-gold-352-million-tonnes-grading-153-gt-and-134-increase-in-inferred-resources-to-1265900-oz-gold-322-million-ton


(2) All numbers are rounded. Overall numbers may not be exact due to rounding.


(3) See Fuerte Metals press release titled "Fuerte Announces Transformational Acquisition of the Coffee Project from Newmont Corporation" dated September 15, 2025.


4) See Western Copper and Gold Corporation technical report titled “Casino project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report Feasibility Study, Yukon Canada”, Effective Date June 13, 2022, Issue Date August 8, 2022, NI 43-101 Compliant Technical Report prepared by Daniel Roth, PE, P.Eng., Mike Hester, F Aus IMM, John M. Marek, P.E., Laurie M. Tahija, MMSA-QP, Carl Schulze, P.Geo., Daniel Friedman, P.Eng., Scott Weston, P.Geo., available on SEDAR+


Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Information


This news release contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. Any statement that involves discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “proposed”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “forecasts”, “estimates”, “believes” or “intends” or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results “may” or “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. In this news release, forward-looking statements relate, among other things, the Company’s objectives, goals and exploration activities conducted and proposed to be conducted at the Company’s properties; future growth potential of the Company, including whether any proposed exploration programs at any of the Company’s properties will be successful; exploration results; and future exploration plans and costs and financing availability.


These forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions and estimates of management of the Company at the time such statements were made. Actual future results may differ materially as forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to materially differ from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors, among other things, include:


The expected benefits to the Company relating to the exploration conducted and proposed to be conducted at the White Gold properties; failure to identify any additional mineral resources or significant mineralization; the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results; uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, including to fund any exploration programs on the Company’s properties; business integration risks; fluctuations in general macroeconomic conditions; fluctuations in securities markets; fluctuations in spot and forward prices of gold, silver, base metals or certain other commodities; fluctuations in currency markets (such as the Canadian dollar to United States dollar exchange rate); change in national and local government, legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and political or economic developments; risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining (including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations pressures, cave-ins and flooding); inability to obtain adequate insurance to cover risks and hazards; the presence of laws and regulations that may impose restrictions on mining and mineral exploration; employee relations; relationships with and claims by local communities and indigenous populations; availability of increasing costs associated with mining inputs and labour; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development (including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses, permits and approvals from government authorities); the unlikelihood that properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines; geological factors; actual results of current and future exploration; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be evaluated; soil sampling results being preliminary in nature and are not conclusive evidence of the likelihood of a mineral deposit; title to properties; and those factors described under the heading “Risks Factors” in the Company’s annual information form dated July 29, 2020 available on SEDAR+. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are based upon what management of the Company believes, or believed at the time, to be reasonable assumptions, the Company cannot assure shareholders that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking statements, as there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information, or the material factors or assumptions used to develop such forward-looking information, will prove to be accurate. The Company does not undertake to release publicly any revisions for updating any voluntary forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable securities law.



Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.


For Further Information, Please Contact:

Contact Information:

David D’Onofrio

Chief Executive Officer

White Gold Corp.

(647) 930-1880

ir@whitegoldcorp.ca

 

Request Meeting: https://cal.com/whitegoldcorp

FOLLOW US
Twitter  Facebook  Linkedin  Instagram  Youtube