equityworld futures pusat

Senin, 08 April 2024

Well Water Safety: Testing, Contaminants, and Treatment Solutions

If you rely on a private well for your water supply, well water testing is essential to ensure the safety of your drinking water, as well as for overall household use. Unlike municipal water sources, which undergo regular treatment and monitoring, private wells are the homeowner's responsibility. This means that potential contaminants – whether from natural sources, human activities, or well system malfunctions – may not be detected without proactive testing.

Well water can harbor various contaminants that might affect your health. Bacteria, like E. coli, can cause gastrointestinal illnesses, while nitrates pose a particular risk for infants. Heavy metals like lead and arsenic have links to developmental problems and long-term health risks. Other contaminants, including minerals and chemicals, might not cause immediate illness but can affect the taste, odor, or appearance of your water.

Regular well water testing is the only way to proactively identify these potential issues. By understanding what's in your water, you can make informed decisions about treatment options and protect your household's health.

Why Well Water Testing Matters

Common Contaminants and Health Risks

It's crucial to understand that even clear, pleasant-tasting well water can contain harmful contaminants. Here are some of the most concerning categories:

  • Bacteria: Bacteria like coliform and E. coli can originate from septic systems or animal waste. They typically cause gastrointestinal issues like diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.
  • Nitrates: Nitrates often leach into groundwater from fertilizers, septic systems, or livestock operations. They're particularly dangerous for infants, leading to "blue baby syndrome" (methemoglobinemia), a condition that reduces the blood's ability to carry oxygen.
  • Lead: Lead in drinking water often comes from corroded plumbing materials. Lead exposure can cause developmental delays and learning difficulties in children, and health problems in adults, including high blood pressure and kidney issues.
  • Arsenic: Arsenic is a naturally occurring element found in some rock formations. Long-term arsenic exposure increases the risk of various cancers, including skin, bladder, and lung cancer.
  • Radon: Radon is a radioactive gas that can seep into wells from underground sources. Exposure to radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking.
  • Other Contaminants: Well water can also contain excessive minerals (hardness, iron), pesticides, industrial chemicals, and other contaminants with varying health effects.

Long-Term Health Considerations

Some contaminants may not cause immediate illness, but their effects can accumulate with long-term exposure. Regular well water testing is the best way to monitor these potential risks and take action to keep your water safe. Additionally, well water testing gives you a baseline so you can detect any changes in your water quality over time.

Peace of Mind

Knowing what's in your well water offers peace of mind. When you're sure your water is safe, you can confidently use it for drinking, cooking, bathing, and other household activities, ensuring your family's health and well-being.

When to Test Your Well Water

Recommended Testing Frequency

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends testing your well water at least annually for total coliform bacteria, nitrates, total dissolved solids, and pH levels. More frequent testing might be necessary depending on your area's risk factors or if you notice changes in your water.

Situations Requiring Immediate Testing

In addition to routine testing, schedule water testing immediately if you experience any of the following:

  • New Well or Major Repairs: If you have a newly constructed well or have undergone significant repairs, testing ensures it's producing safe water.
  • Changes in Water Quality: Changes in taste, odor, or appearance (cloudiness, unusual colors) can indicate contamination.
  • Gastrointestinal Illness: If household members experience unexplained stomach issues, test for bacterial contamination.
  • Infants or Pregnancy: Infants and pregnant women are more susceptible to waterborne contaminants, so extra precaution is vital.
  • Malfunctioning Septic Systems: Issues with your septic system increase the risk of groundwater contamination near your well.
  • Changes in Land Use: If new agricultural operations, industrial facilities, or other potential sources of contamination move near your property, prompt testing is warranted.

Staying Proactive

Remember, well water contamination isn't always obvious. Regular testing is a crucial part of responsible well ownership and ensures a safe drinking water supply for your household.

How to Get Your Well Water Tested

Types of Tests

  • DIY Test Kits: Home testing kits provide a basic analysis for some common contaminants like bacteria, nitrates, and pH. These kits offer limited accuracy and shouldn't replace thorough professional testing.
  • Professional Laboratories: Accredited laboratories offer comprehensive water testing services that analyze a wide range of contaminants, including bacteria, heavy metals, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). They provide detailed reports and guidance on interpreting results.

Finding Reputable Labs

Choosing a certified laboratory is critical for accurate results and reliable recommendations. Here's how to find one:

  • State Health or Environmental Departments: Contact your state health department or the equivalent environmental agency for a list of accredited water testing labs in your area.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): The CDC provides resources for finding certified laboratories.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): The EPA maintains a list of certified drinking water laboratories by state.

Understanding Your Test Results

Labs provide a detailed analysis of your water, including the levels of detected contaminants. Compare the results to the EPA's drinking water standards to determine if any contaminants exceed safe limits. Resources from agencies like the CDC and state health departments can help you interpret your results and determine the appropriate course of action.

What to Do If Your Well Water is Contaminated

Don't Panic

While concerning, most well water contamination issues are treatable. The first step is to understand the specific contaminants present, their potential health effects, and the appropriate remediation options.

Immediate Actions

  • Stop Drinking the Water: If contaminants exceed safe levels, immediately stop drinking and using your well water for cooking or brushing teeth.
  • Use Bottled Water: Use a reliable source of bottled water for drinking, cooking, and other essential needs until you implement a solution.

Seek Professional Guidance

  • Contact Your Health Department: Consult your state or local health department for guidance tailored to the specific contaminant(s) found in your water. They can help you understand health risks and recommend next steps.
  • Consult a Well Water Specialist: A certified well water contractor can assess your well system, identify potential contamination sources, and recommend treatment options.

Treatment Options

The best treatment solution depends on the type and level of contaminant(s). Some common options include:

  • Filtration Systems: Various filters target specific contaminants like bacteria, nitrates, heavy metals, or minerals.
  • Distillation: Distillation removes minerals, some metals, and effectively eliminates bacteria and viruses.
  • Chlorination: Chlorination effectively kills bacteria and viruses but may not address other contaminants.
  • Other Technologies: Technologies like reverse osmosis or ultraviolet (UV) light treatment offer solutions for a range of contaminants.

Choosing the Right Solution

Always consult with professionals to determine the most appropriate treatment system based on your test results, well characteristics, and household needs.

Well Maintenance for Safe Water

Alongside testing, regular well maintenance is crucial for protecting your water supply and extending the lifespan of your well system. Here's why it matters:

  • Preventing Contamination: Well maintenance helps identify and address potential points of contamination before they affect your water quality.
  • Ensuring System Functionality: Regular inspections catch mechanical issues early, preventing malfunctions that could compromise water safety or lead to costly repairs.
  • Proactive Protection: Well maintenance empowers you to take proactive steps safeguarding your drinking water, rather than just reacting to problems as they arise.

Key Maintenance Practices

  • Annual Inspections: Schedule yearly checkups with a qualified well contractor to inspect your well's casing, cap, and mechanical components.
  • Proper Location and Construction: Follow guidelines for well placement at a safe distance from potential contamination sources (septic systems, livestock pens, etc.). Ensure your well is constructed according to standards, with a sanitary seal preventing surface runoff from entering.
  • Protecting Your Wellhead: Maintain a clear area around your wellhead, keep it free of debris, and ensure the well cap is securely in place.
  • Monitoring for Changes: Be observant. Report any changes in your water, unusual activity around your well, or damage to the well.
  • Septic System Maintenance: Regularly pump and inspect your septic system to prevent malfunctions that could contaminate your well.

Safeguarding Your Well Water: Key Takeaways and Next Steps

Well water testing is an essential responsibility for private well owners. Regular testing identifies potential contaminants that may pose health risks, allowing you to make informed decisions about water treatment for safe consumption and household use. Understanding common contaminants, when to test, how to choose a lab, and simple maintenance practices significantly reduces risks and ensures ongoing access to safe drinking water.

Key Takeaways

  • Well water, unlike municipal water, isn't regularly treated or monitored.
  • Bacteria, nitrates, lead, arsenic, and other contaminants can jeopardize the safety of your water supply.
  • Test your well at least annually, and more often if risk factors are present or you notice changes in your water.
  • Professional water testing laboratories provide the most comprehensive analysis and guidance.
  • Prioritize regular well inspections and maintenance to prevent contamination and protect your investment.

Don't take chances with your family's health. If you rely on a private well:

  • Locate a certified water testing lab near you. Contact your state health department for resources as a starting point.
  • Schedule your initial well water test. Discuss the details of the testing process and expected timeframe for results with your chosen lab.
  • Consult a well water professional. Have a qualified contractor inspect your well system and offer advice on maintenance best practices.

By following these steps, you'll gain the peace of mind that comes from knowing your well water is safe and protecting the well-being of your household.

#wellwatertesting #wellwater #wellwatersafety #drinkingwater #groundwater #waterquality #homeowner #watercontamination #ruralliving #privatewell #health #bacteria #nitrates #arsenic #lead #homewater #watertreatment #cleanwater #watertest #watertestingkit

Resources:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Broadcaster" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to broadcaster-news+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/broadcaster-news/20a3e919-b05c-4838-adaa-9b3f24f85da4n%40googlegroups.com.

Kamis, 28 Maret 2024

It's not too late! Join this exciting event with our Capital Markets & IR Consultant, Paul Pint

Facebook  LinkedIn  X  Instagram

In one hour, join two exploration company executives delve into the art of investor relations during the exploration phase. They share how to keep audiences informed throughout any twists and turns in a company's journey. This event provides insights into various levers available to effectively communicate an exploration story, ensuring investors remain engaged every step of the way.


Join Paul and Terry today at 10 AM ET / 7 AM PT

Click Here To Register For The Event


Facebook  LinkedIn  X  Instagram

Rabu, 27 Maret 2024

Join this exciting event with our Capital Markets & IR Consultant, Paul Pint

Facebook  LinkedIn  X  Instagram

Three exploration company executives delve into the art of investor relations during the exploration phase. They share how to keep audiences informed throughout any twists and turns in a company's journey. This event provides insights into various levers available to effectively communicate an exploration story, ensuring investors remain engaged every step of the way.


Join Paul, Terry and Andrew on Thursday, March 28th at 10 AM ET / 7 AM PT

Click Here To Register For The Event


Facebook  LinkedIn  X  Instagram

White Gold Corp. Identifies Multiple Prospective IP Chargeability Anomalies

White Gold Corp. Identifies Multiple Prospective IP Chargeability Anomalies on Two Large Multi-Element Porphyry Targets in Close Proximity to the Casino Copper-Gold Porphyry Deposit, Yukon, Canada
Share this story...
TORONTO, March 27, 2024 – White Gold Corp. (TSX.V: WGO, OTCQX: WHGOF, FRA: 29W) (the "Company") is pleased to provide an exploration update on the Bridget and Isaac porphyry targets located on the Pedlar and Hayes properties, respectively. Exploration work completed during 2023 included Induced Polarization (IP) chargeability and resistivity survey lines and hyperspectral analysis on 2022 prosecting rock samples. All data collected thus far on these large early-stage targets continue to support a porphyry deposit model.
 
The Pedlar and Hayes properties are situated in the southern part of the Company’s 315,000 hectare (3,150 km2) land package in the White Gold District, west-central Yukon (Figure 1). Western Copper and Gold Corporation’s (TSX: WRN, NYSE American: WRN) Casino copper-gold-molybdenum porphyry deposit (Measured & Indicated Resources of 7.6 Blb copper and 14.5 Moz gold and Inferred Resources of 3.3 Blb copper and 6.6 Moz gold) sits approximately 30 km southwest and 40 km west of the Bridget and Isaac targets respectively. Casino is one of the largest undeveloped copper-gold projects in Canada, and since 2021 has seen strategic investments by major partners including Rio Tinto Canada Inc. and Mitsubishi Materials Corporation. The Pedlar and Hayes properties are also located 40 km and 72 km southeast, respectively, of the Company’s flagship White Gold project which contains an estimated 1,152,900 ounces of gold in Indicated Resources and 942,400 ounces of gold in Inferred Resources(1).
 
Terry Brace, Vice President of Exploration commented: “We are encouraged by results of the 2023 IP test lines at the Bridget and Isaac targets which identified new anomalies and structures that overall correlate well with the soil geochemistry anomalies and current structural interpretations. The new IP looked deeper than any previous geophysical surveys and demonstrates potential at depth beneath these large multi-element soil anomalies. The test results warrant full IP survey coverage over the target areas which will aid in mapping these systems at depth in support of future diamond drill testing.
 
Shawn Ryan, co-founder, Chief Technical Advisor and Director, commented further: “The Bridget target has an interesting history as it was one of four top prospects that was first discovered back in 1972 when Silver Standard Mines conducted an extensive 14,000 plus regional silt survey looking for another Casino. During the large regional silt survey, Silver Standard also made the Minto Copper discovery and eventually focused all their attention on that target. I staked the Bridget prospect back in 2004, and since then the property has seen extensive soil sampling programs, airborne radiometric surveys and shallow RAB drilling. The soil sampling program revealed a large copper, molybdenum and bismuth soil anomaly. The molybdenum anomaly (2 to 322 ppm) measures 4 km by 1.7 km and coincides with a very discrete bismuth anomaly (2 to 154 ppm) of 3 km by 1.4 km and a copper core anomaly (50 to 711 ppm) measuring 2.8 km by 1.3 km. A deep penetrating dipole-dipole IP survey was undertaken in summer 2023 with one line over the core of the soil anomaly and the results clearly show a textbook porphyry geophysical signature of resistivity lows and chargeability high anomalies sitting below the anomalous soils. It’s now recommended to follow up with more IP survey lines to cover this large developing porphyry target. I look forward to first diamond drill holes into this exciting target.
 
An overview of the Pedlar and Hayes properties, including the Bridget and Isaac targets, was provided previously in a news release dated April 5, 2023 which is available on the Company’s website (https://whitegoldcorp.ca/news/) and on SEDAR+. Maps and images accompanying this news release can be found at http://whitegoldcorp.ca/investors/exploration-highlights/.
Highlights

  • The Bridget and Isaac targets represent large, early-stage, multi-element porphyry targets that have never been diamond drill tested.
  • Deep penetrating test IP survey lines conducted over existing soil geochemistry anomalies have identified a total of 13 chargeability anomalies, 5 at Bridget and 8 at Isaac.
  • The Bridget soil anomaly on the Pedlar property measures 3 km NW-SE by 3.5 km NE-SW and is interpreted to represent a copper-molybdenum porphyry target. It is geochemically zoned with a molybdenum-copper-bismuth core and a silver-zinc-lead-tungsten halo.
  • At Bridget, one 1st priority and four 2nd priority chargeability anomalies were identified, with target depths ranging from 40 to 330 m. The chargeability anomalies underly a large molybdenum-copper soil anomaly, and a zone of moderate to strong chargeability to the southwest appears to mark a controlling WNW (290°) striking fault which correlates with anomalous lead-zinc-arsenic in soils.
  • The Isaac soil anomaly on the Hayes property is a recently discovered target which measures 2 km E-W by 1.5 km N-S, and is interpreted to represent a copper-molybdenum porphyry target. It is geochemically zoned with a bismuth-arsenic-copper core and a silver-zinc-lead halo.
  • At Isaac, four 1st priority, three 2nd priority and one 3rd priority chargeability anomalies were identified, with target depths ranging from 50 to 550 m. The bismuth and copper core of the soil anomaly is underlain by multiple chargeability anomalies (S1, S2, M1 and W1 on Line 1E) which sit above a resistivity low. Anomalous lead, zinc, and silver, which form a halo around the core, are coincident with fault structures on the south side and north side of the survey area which trend NE (065°) and NW (290°) respectively.
  • 2022 prospecting rock samples from both the Bridget and Isaac targets show anomalous trace element enrichments, including copper, molybdenum and silver, consistent with proximal porphyry copper-style mineralization.
  • Hyperspectral analysis results for the prosecting rock samples at both Bridget and Isaac show alteration mineralogy consistent with a porphyry deposit model.
  • The Company is currently planning its fully funded 2024 exploration program, focusing on its existing significant gold resources, new high grade gold discoveries and other high priority gold and multi-element targets. The Company will arrange a webinar to provide a more detailed overview of the 2023 exploration results and plans for 2024 at that time. Details to be announced in due course.
2023 IP Surveys
 
In August 2023, Simcoe Geoscience Limited (Simcoe) carried out 7.2 line-km of time domain induced polarization (IP) chargeability and resistivity surveying at the Bridget and Isaac targets using their wireless 2D Alpha IP™ system (see About IP Survey below). At Bridget, a single 3.0 km long IP test line (line 1N) oriented NE-SW was completed using a dipole-dipole configuration. At Isaac, two IP test lines totaling 4.2 km long were oriented perpendicular to each other at NE-SW (line 4N) and NW-SE (line 1E) using a dipole-pole-dipole configuration. Both configurations can detect anomalies up to 600+ m depth.
IP Results
 
At Bridget, five chargeability anomalies were identified on Line 1N (Figure 3), including one 1st priority anomaly (S1) and four 2nd priority anomalies (M1-M4). Anomaly S1 has a target depth of 130 m and is characterized by strong chargeability and low resistivity. Target depths on the second priority anomalies range from 40 m (M3, M4) to a maximum of 330 m (M1). These are characterized by moderate to high chargeability and low to high resistivity.
 
The Bridget chargeability anomalies are plotted in relation to soil geochemistry results in Figure 4 (molybdenum, copper, lead, zinc) and Figure 5 (copper). The chargeability anomalies generally correspond with a zone of low resistivity which underlie a large molybdenum-copper soil anomaly. A zone of moderate (M1) to strong (S1) chargeability in the southwest delineates a controlling west-northwest (WNW, 290°) striking fault structure, closely correlated with lead, zinc, and arsenic soil anomalies. To the northeast, a similar WNW (295°) anomaly in lead, zinc, and arsenic defines the boundary of this chargeability anomaly and coincides with a significant tungsten anomaly, positioned along the northeastern fringe of a molybdenum anomaly. It is worth noting that in 2018 the Company drilled 10 short rotary air blast (RAB) drill holes totalling 548.6 m over the area between chargeability anomalies M2 and S1. However, these RAB holes were testing surface soil anomalies and drilled to a shallow maximum depth of only 70 m, hence the newly IP chargeability anomalies identified are completely untested.
At Isaac, 8 chargeability anomalies were identified on Lines 1E and 4N. Five anomalies occur on Line 1E (Figure 6), including three 1st priority anomalies (S1-S3), one 2nd priority anomaly (M1) and one 3rd priority anomaly (W1). The 1st priority anomalies are characterized by moderate chargeability and low to high resistivity. Target depths of the 1st priority anomalies range from 70 m (S3) to 250 m (S2). An additional three anomalies occur on Line 4N (Figure 7), including one 1st priority anomaly (S1) and two 2nd priority anomalies (M1-M2) (see Figure 7). Target depths of these chargeability anomalies range from 220 – 550 m.
 
The Isaac chargeability anomalies on Line 1E, oriented NW-SE, are plotted in relation to soil geochemistry results for select elements (bismuth, copper, lead, silver) in Figure 8. The bismuth anomaly appears to be controlled by faults interpreted from the IP resistivity data. The bismuth and copper core of the soil anomaly is underlain by multiple chargeability anomalies (S1, S2, M1 and W1) which sit above a resistivity low which is interpreted as a fault structure. Lead, zinc, and silver, which form a halo around the core, are coincident with fault structures on the south side and north side of the survey area which trend NE (065°) and NW (290°) respectively. Isaac is a recently recognized (2021) target and has never been drilled tested.
2023 Hyperspectral Analysis & Results
 
During 2023, crushed coarse rejects from 2022 prospecting rock samples from the Pedlar and Hayes properties were analyzed with an ASD TerraSpec® 4 Hi-Res Mineral Spectrometer. Results were uploaded and processed using IMDEX’s aiSIRIS™ cloud-based mineral interpretation AI software to produce semi-quantitative, standardized mineral interpretations and analytics (see About Hyperspectral Analysis below).
 
The Hyperspectral analysis results for the prosecting rock samples show alteration mineralogy consistent with a porphyry deposit model.
 
A total of 17 prospecting rock samples were collected at the Bridget target and 19 samples at the Isaac target. Samples from both the Bridget and Isaac targets show anomalous trace element enrichments, including copper, molybdenum and silver, consistent with proximal porphyry copper-style mineralization. Hyperspectral data for the Isaac target samples provide evidence for phyllic alteration characterized by muscovite and potassic alteration, with evidence of propylitic alteration found only on the southern edge of the sampled area where significant chlorite is observed. The Bridget samples show no evidence of phyllic alteration, however most samples show both geochemical and hyperspectral evidence for widespread propylitic alteration involving epidote, chlorite and albite, as well as minor potassic alteration.
 
Next Steps
 
The Company is encouraged by the success of the IP test lines in detecting chargeability and resistivity anomalies beneath the soil geochemistry anomalies at the Bridget and Isaac targets at depths from 40m to 550m below surface. These results warrant full IP survey coverage over the target areas which will aid in identifying targets at depth in support of future diamond drill testing.
About the Bridget Target

The Bridget target area is located on the Pedlar property and was first explored by Silver Standard Mines Ltd. (“Silver Standard”) and Asarco Exploration Company of Canada Ltd. (“Asarco”) in the early 1970’s following the discovery of the Casino Copper-Gold-Molybdenum porphyry deposit. A series of regional silt samples, soil sampling, and geophysical surveys by Silver Standard in 1971 and 1972 led to the discovery of a significant molybdenum-copper geochemical anomaly, now known as the Bridget target. Historical exploration work between 2004 and 2016 included soil sampling, prospecting, geological mapping, and geophysical surveys. In 2016 the Company acquired ownership of the property and has continued to expand the large multi-element (molybdenum, copper, bismuth, tungsten, lead, silver) soil geochemical anomaly that currently measures 3 km NW-SE by 4.3 km NE-SW. In 2018, a maiden rotary air blast (RAB) drilling program comprising 10 holes totalling 548.6 m was completed; however, the RAB holes were short testing to a maximum vertical depth of only 70 m, well short of potential porphyry mineralization at depth beneath the anomalous soils. Porphyry targets characterized by IP chargeability high anomalies remain completely untested.
 
About the Isaac Target

The Isaac target is located on the Hayes property and was first recognized by the Company as a prospective porphyry target in 2021 through soil sampling. Gridded soil sampling (50 m spaced samples on 100 m spaced survey lines) was conducted in an area located approximately 5 km south of the Yukon River where a 2017 reconnaissance soil survey identified several isolated anomalous ridge and spur soil samples. The 2021 sampling identified a new geochemically zoned multi-element soil anomaly named the Isaac target, which measures approximately 2 km east-west by 1.5 km north-south. The anomaly has a central core measuring from 750 m to 1,000 m in diameter and enriched in bismuth and arsenic, which is surrounded by a halo of anomalous silver, lead and zinc that is greater than 400 m wide. Anomalous copper occurs in the southern portion of the core, and a relatively small area of anomalous molybdenum occurs near the core’s northern margin. Geologically the soil anomaly is associated with a plug of Late Cretaceous Prospector Mountain suite, which is known to be prospective for porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum and epithermal style mineralization. The geochemical zonation and elemental distributions indicate that the anomaly may represent the surface expression of a copper-molybdenum porphyry core surrounded by distal or epithermal style silver-lead-zinc mineralization. Follow-up geological mapping and prospecting in 2022 at the Isaac target area returned anomalous copper values from the core area of the soil anomaly, with three grab samples returning from 730.6 – 1269.2 ppm Copper.
 
About Hyperspectral Analysis
 
Crushed coarse rejects from 2022 prospecting rock samples were analyzed with an ASD TerraSpec® 4 Hi-Res Mineral Spectrometer by Bureau Veritas Commodities Canada Ltd. at their preparation laboratory in Whitehorse, Yukon. Results were uploaded and processed using IMDEX’s aiSIRIS™ cloud-based mineral interpretation AI software to produce semi-quantitative, standardized mineral interpretations and analytics. TerraSpec and aiSIRIS data were reviewed and interpreted by Dr. Dennis Arne, a principal consulting geochemist with Telemark Geosciences Pty Ltd, a geological consulting services company based in Victoria, Australia.
 
About IP Survey
 
The 2023 IP surveys were completed by Simcoe Geoscience Limited (Simcoe) using their wireless time domain 2D Alpha IP™ system (https://www.simcoegeoscience.com/wireless-alpha-ip). Survey data was recorded in a Reverse & Forward array configuration with readings taken every 100 m along the line. A dipole-dipole configuration was used at the Bridget target, and a dipole-pole-dipole configuration at the Isaac target. Once the IP data satisfied the QA/QC process, the entire survey line file was exported into UBC format to run the model 2D inversions. Results were reviewed, interpreted and chargeability anomalies ranked by Simcoe’s in-house geophysicist.
FOLLOW US
About White Gold Corp.

The Company owns a portfolio of 15,876 quartz claims across 26 properties covering approximately 315,000 hectares (3,150 km2) representing over 40% of the Yukon’s emerging White Gold District. The Company’s flagship White Gold project hosts four near-surface gold deposits which collectively contain an estimated 1,152,900 ounces of gold in Indicated Resources and 942,400 ounces of gold in Inferred Resources(1). Regional exploration work has also produced several other new discoveries and prospective targets on the Company’s claim packages which border sizable gold discoveries including the Coffee project owned by Newmont Corporation with Measured and Indicated Resources of 2.1 Moz at 1.28 g/t gold and Inferred Resources of 0.2 Moz at 1.0 g/t gold(2), and Western Copper and Gold Corporation’s Casino project which has Measured and Indicated Resources of 7.6 Blb copper and 14.5 Moz gold and Inferred Resources of 3.3 Blb copper and 6.6 Moz gold(3). For more information visit www.whitegoldcorp.ca.
 
(1) See White Gold Corp. technical report titled “2023 Technical Report for the White Gold Project, Dawson Range, Yukon, Canada ”, Effective Date April 15, 2023, Report Date May 30, 2023, NI 43-101 Compliant Technical Report prepared by Dr. Gilles Arseneau, P.Geo., available on SEDAR+.
(2) See Newmont Corporation Form 10-K: Annual report for the year ending December 31, 2023, in the Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Resources section, dated February 29, 2024, available on EDGAR. Reserves and resources disclosed in this Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with the Regulation S-K 1300, and do not indicate NI43-101 compliance.
(3) See Western Copper and Gold Corporation technical report titled “Casino project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report Feasibility Study, Yukon Canada”, Effective Date June 13, 2022, Issue Date August 8, 2022, NI 43-101 Compliant Technical Report prepared by Daniel Roth, PE, P.Eng., Mike Hester, F Aus IMM, John M. Marek, P.E., Laurie M. Tahija, MMSA-QP, Carl Schulze, P.Geo., Daniel Friedman, P.Eng., Scott Weston, P.Geo., available on SEDAR+.
(5) See Minto Metals Corp. technical report titled “Form 43-101F1 Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report, Minto, Yukon Canada”, Effective Date March 31, 2021, Report Date May 7, 2021, prepared by Dino Pilotto, P.Eng., Tysen Hantelmann, P. Eng., Mike Levy, P.E., Sue Bird, P. Eng., Carl Schulze, P. Geo., Tad Crowie, P. Eng., Cheibany Elemine, Ph. D., P. Geo., Sam Amiralaei, P. Eng., John Kurylo, P. Eng., available on SEDAR.
(6) See Granite Creek Copper Ltd. technical report titled “Updated Mineral Resource Estimates for the Carmacks Cu-Au-Ag Project Near Carmacks, Yukon, Canada”, Effective Date February 25, 2022, Report Date April 29, 2022, prepared by Allan Armitage, Ph. D., P. Geo., available on SEDAR.
(7) Allan, M.M., Mortensen, J.K., Hart, C.J.R., Bailey, L.A., Sánchez, M.G., Ciolkiewicz, W., McKenzie, G.G. and Creaser, R.A., 2013, Magmatic and Metallogenic Framework of West-Central Yukon and Eastern Alaska: Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication 17, pp. 111-168.
 
 
Qualified Person
Terry Brace, P.Geo. and Vice President of Exploration for the Company is a “qualified person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure of Mineral Projects and has reviewed and approved the content of this news release.
 
 
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Information
This news release contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. Any statement that involves discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “proposed”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “forecasts”, “estimates”, “believes” or “intends” or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results “may” or “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. In this news release, forward-looking statements relate, among other things, the Company’s objectives, goals and exploration activities conducted and proposed to be conducted at the Company’s properties; future growth potential of the Company, including whether any proposed exploration programs at any of the Company’s properties will be successful; exploration results; and future exploration plans and costs and financing availability.
 
These forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions and estimates of management of the Company at the time such statements were made. Actual future results may differ materially as forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to materially differ from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors, among other things, include:

The expected benefits to the Company relating to the exploration conducted and proposed to be conducted at the White Gold properties; the receipt of all applicable regulatory approvals for the Offering; failure to identify any additional mineral resources or significant mineralization; the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results; uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, including to fund any exploration programs on the Company’s properties; business integration risks; fluctuations in general macroeconomic conditions; fluctuations in securities markets; fluctuations in spot and forward prices of gold, silver, base metals or certain other commodities; fluctuations in currency markets (such as the Canadian dollar to United States dollar exchange rate); change in national and local government, legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and political or economic developments; risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining (including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations pressures, cave-ins and flooding); inability to obtain adequate insurance to cover risks and hazards; the presence of laws and regulations that may impose restrictions on mining and mineral exploration; employee relations; relationships with and claims by local communities and indigenous populations; availability of increasing costs associated with mining inputs and labour; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development (including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses, permits and approvals from government authorities); the unlikelihood that properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines; geological factors; actual results of current and future exploration; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be evaluated; soil sampling results being preliminary in nature and are not conclusive evidence of the likelihood of a mineral deposit; title to properties; ongoing uncertainties relating to the COVID-19 pandemic; and those factors described under the heading “Risks Factors” in the Company’s annual information form dated July 29, 2020 available on SEDAR+. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are based upon what management of the Company believes, or believed at the time, to be reasonable assumptions, the Company cannot assure shareholders that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking statements, as there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information, or the material factors or assumptions used to develop such forward-looking information, will prove to be accurate. The Company does not undertake to release publicly any revisions for updating any voluntary forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable securities law.
 
Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.
 
For Further Information, Please Contact:
 
Contact Information:
David D’Onofrio
Chief Executive Officer
White Gold Corp.
(647) 930-1880